Summary
85
Taking a Stance
Fall 2015
Few critics have yet dared to challenge the intellectual power assumed by certain institutions and forums that shape artistic trends and condition the discourses. esse opens the debate on the forms and conditions at play when taking a critical stance in the world of contemporary art today. What does art criticism imply in today’s context?
Editorial
Feature
Kunstgriff: Art as Event, Not Commodity
Fashionably Late
Critical Distances
Resemblance, Doubt, and Ruin
When Images Take a Position: Didi-Huberman’s Brechtian Intervention
Critical Art, Critical Sense, and Receptivity
Reel-Unreel, by Francis Alÿs
Indigenous Voices and White Pedagogy
Self-Determination When Cash Rules Everything Around Us
Portfolios
Off-Features
Columns
Reviews
Young Critics
Current Issue
Crip
Spring Summer 2026
While “handi” (short for the term “handicapé” in French) and “crip” (derived from “cripple,” meaning “disabled”) are diminutive forms of stigmatizing terms, the meaning we ascribe to them is by no means reductive. On the contrary, they carry a political weight that provides those who embrace them with a powerful tool for empowerment, offering disabled artists non-normative ways for articulating the strange temporalities of disabled experience and alternative ways for navigating an ableist art world. In this issue, we are interested precisely in this work of social, political, and cultural transformation, and we focus on the ways in which crip authors and artists address the different challenges they face.
Cover: Hac Vinent
Accident, exhibition view, Fundació Joan Miró, Barcelona, 2024.
Photo: Roberto Ruiz, courtesy of the artist & ADN Galeria, Barcelona