Summary
97
Appropriation
Fall 2019
Contemporary art practices are constantly going outside the field of art to appropriate the codes, gestures, and mechanisms of other social and cultural spheres. However, appropriation also involves the question of social responsibility with regards to artists and curators, particularly in recent debates around cultural appropriation. The aim of this issue is to take some distance from the polarization of the controversies so as to try to better understand what these various forms of appropriation show us about current artistic creation at the aesthetic, ethical, and political levels.
Editorial
Feature
Artistic Appropriation Versus Cultural Appropriation
Against Innovation: Appropriation and Disruption in the Age of Immaterial Bondage
Art in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Expropriation as Art Practice
Art: Whose Legacy?
Appropriation. Panel discussion
Cultural Imperative, Appropriationist Regime and Visual Art
Kanata: Appropriation or Erasure?
Portfolios
Columns
Reviews
Young Critics
Current Issue
Crip
Spring Summer 2026
While “handi” (short for the term “handicapé” in French) and “crip” (derived from “cripple,” meaning “disabled”) are diminutive forms of stigmatizing terms, the meaning we ascribe to them is by no means reductive. On the contrary, they carry a political weight that provides those who embrace them with a powerful tool for empowerment, offering disabled artists non-normative ways for articulating the strange temporalities of disabled experience and alternative ways for navigating an ableist art world. In this issue, we are interested precisely in this work of social, political, and cultural transformation, and we focus on the ways in which crip authors and artists address the different challenges they face.
Cover: Hac Vinent
Accident, exhibition view, Fundació Joan Miró, Barcelona, 2024.
Photo: Roberto Ruiz, courtesy of the artist & ADN Galeria, Barcelona